{"version":"reconciled-tree-39","date":"2026-10-13","scope":"Roman account continuity and the qualified gold-account branch; Bactrian financial records and early Indus monetary boundaries.","new_currency_ids":["CUR-V39-ROB-GOLD-DINAR"],"new_claim_ids":["C2075","C2076","C2077","C2078","C2079","C2080","C2081","C2082","C2083","C2084","C2085","C2086","C2087","C2088","C2089","C2090","C2091","C2092","C2093"],"new_source_ids":["S1085","S1086","S1087","S1088","S1089","S1090","S1091","S1092","S1093","S1094","S1095","S1096","S1097","S1098","S1099"],"source_map":{"carbone":"S1085","butcher":"S1086","strobel":"S1087","jones":"S1088","buttrey":"S1089","rovelli":"S483","bransbourg":"S1090","bagnall89":"S1091","vrat":"S1092","clarysse":"S1093","rapin":"S1094","jakobsson":"S1095","deromanis":"S1067","kenoyer":"S1096","museum":"S1097","morris":"S1098","yakubovich":"S1099"},"claim_map":{"scales":"C2075","antoninianus":"C2076","tariff301":"C2077","communis":"C2078","vrat":"C2079","myriads566":"C2080","aureus":"C2081","siliqua":"C2082","floating":"C2083","gold_branch":"C2084","bactria_amphipolis":"C2085","aikhanoum":"C2086","asangorna":"C2087","bactria_scope":"C2088","indian_labels":"C2089","gandhara":"C2090","harappa":"C2091","rob":"C2092","rob_parent":"C2093"},"relationships":[{"current_basis_claim_ids":["C2084"],"id":"R-V39-001","parent":"CUR-V25-ROMAN-DENARIUS","child":"CUR-V26-EGYPT-SOLIDUS-NOMISMA","kind":"monetary_reform_succession","layer":"primary","date":{"earliest_year":274,"latest_year":375,"precision":"range","qualifier":"range","calendar":"CE/BCE, historical year numbering; no year zero","original_text":"274–375"},"claim_ids":["C2084"],"source_ids":["S1089","S1090","S483"],"source":"Revision31 earlier accounts","scope":"Admit a qualified gold-account branch through Roman monetary reforms: the aureus was a denomination of denarius/sestertius reckoning; gold valuation separated, and the solidus replaced the aureus and became an independent accounting basis. This is our synthesis of documented monetary transformation, not a quoted genealogical conclusion. The274–375 research envelope compresses reform and account emergence, not a founding date, fixed conversion or end of denarius reckoning.","status":"qualified_draft","valuation_ids":[],"creates_currency":true,"founding_predecessor":true,"ancestry_role":"founding_or_early_ancestry","date_is_creation":false,"display_evidence":{"status":"qualified","line_style":"dashed","qualification_scope":"this_relationship_only"},"date_is_research_envelope":true,"immediate_parent_established":false,"kinship_note":"Ancestry established at the stated scope; no direct sibling derivation without an established immediate parent.","chronology_note":"274–375 research envelope, not a foundation or observation date. Denarius accounting continues alongside the gold branch.","ancestry_evidence_status":"qualified","qualification_reason":"Explicit editorial synthesis of inherited Roman denominations, gold separation, reform succession and independently attested gold accounting; compressed intermediate boundaries.","territorial_scope":"Roman imperial monetary transformation; regional timings vary.","inference_type":"qualified_historical_synthesis"}],"renamed_profiles":[{"currency_id":"CUR-V26-ATHENIAN-DRACHMA","previous_label":"Attic drachma accounting — Athenian and Alexandrine traditions","label":"Attic drachma accounting — Athenian, Alexandrine and Bactrian traditions"}],"adopted_bases":[],"navigation_changes":[],"holds":["Roman gold-account ancestry is a qualified synthesis. Inspect more regional obligation conversions and independent gold-account emergence before asserting an immediate parent, fixed rate or one universal transition date.","The silver-siliqua name is not sufficient evidence of a hard peg. No new adopted-basis record is created.","Late denarius, myriad and nummus usage needs document-specific semantic review; the566 witness does not establish an unchanged denomination across six centuries.","The earlier bronze/as witness remains retrospectively and chronologically qualified. Roman provincial assaria require their own local identification.","Bactrian drachma observations are qualified associations with the broad Attic tradition; the independent regional identity boundary remains open.","Asangorna staters require denomination and identity adjudication before creating or merging a currency profile.","Aï Khanoum’s Indian treasury categories do not establish a complete Taxila account regime or equality with drachmas.","Gandharan/Persian weight transmission is a candidate, not yet proven account ancestry. Harappan metrology does not by itself connect to historical kārṣāpaṇa.","Rob’s gold-dinar fines establish a local account. Earlier Kushan gold-account succession and later regional continuation remain to be evidenced."]}