Evidence coverage: 1500–1520. This is the span of collected observations, not the currency’s lifetime.
This record includes associated currencies and earlier interpretations. The article selects the evidence relevant to its own history.
Evidence within this identity, not separate currencies.
Saxon silver-gulden reckoning began with a 21-groschen equivalent of the gold gulden. Joachimsthal followed the Saxon standard; the later thaler tradition must be distinguished from regional accounts that diverged from its specie value.
Sources and qualifications →Dated evidence, not exact birth or extinction dates.
Saxon silver-gulden reckoning began with a 21-groschen equivalent of the gold gulden. Joachimsthal followed the Saxon standard; the later thaler tradition must be distinguished from regional accounts that diverged from its specie value.
C2115Dated observations, not a proven complete lifespan.
Saxon silver-gulden reckoning began with a 21-groschen equivalent of the gold gulden. Joachimsthal followed the Saxon standard; the later thaler tradition must be distinguished from regional accounts that diverged from its specie value.
Printed pp. X–XII and XVI–XVII; Printed pp. XV and XXI–XXII; PDF pages 23 and 29–30
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Printed pp. X–XII and XVI–XVII; Printed pp. XV and XXI–XXII; PDF pages 23 and 29–30
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
The silver-gulden and thaler tradition grew from a deliberate gold-gulden value basis, through the Saxon and Joachimsthal standards. The regional account development is compressed here, not a sequence of separately invented coin currencies.
Printed pp. X–XII and XVI–XVII
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Earlier thaler reckoning continued into the Brandenburg-Prussian courant account, distinct from specie coin value. The 1750 reform coined the existing 24-groschen unit.
Printed pp. XV and XXI–XXII; PDF pages 23 and 29–30; Object commentary on the 1667 Zinna agreement and Brandenburg implementation from 1670
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Printed pp. XV and XXI–XXII; PDF pages 23 and 29–30; Object commentary on the 1667 Zinna agreement and Brandenburg implementation from 1670
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Swedish silver-daler adoption in 1534 followed the Joachimsthaler monetary model, within the Saxon-Bohemian silver-thaler tradition. The four-mark Swedish daler account is excluded from this specie identity.
Printed pp. 28, 50 and 53; silver daler, Joachimsthaler and later specie terminology; Printed pp. X–XII and XVI–XVII
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Printed pp. 28, 50 and 53; silver daler, Joachimsthaler and later specie terminology; Printed pp. X–XII and XVI–XVII
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Sweden introduced the silver daler in 1534 on the Joachimsthaler model. Its later riksdaler-specie history is distinct from the daler account fixed at four marks.
Printed pp. 28, 50 and 53; silver daler, Joachimsthaler and later specie terminology
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Brandenburg joined Saxony in the 1667 Zinna arrangements, applied throughout its mints from 1670. The 1750 Prussian thaler embodied the existing 24-groschen account rather than beginning a wholly new account unit.
Object commentary on the 1667 Zinna agreement and Brandenburg implementation from 1670; Printed pp. XV and XXI–XXII; PDF pages 23 and 29–30
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Object commentary on the 1667 Zinna agreement and Brandenburg implementation from 1670; Printed pp. XV and XXI–XXII; PDF pages 23 and 29–30
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.