Pennsylvania pounds, shillings and pence in rewards, contracts and bookkeeping, independent of payment medium.
One scoped currency identity. Changes to subdivisions, scale, standard, instruments or issuers do not by themselves create children. A distinct account unit can remain a successor. Dated observations: 1720–1794; this does not establish the entire lifetime.
Parents / predecessors
No distinct predecessor currency is established in the loaded view.
Children / successors
No distinct successor currency is established in the loaded view.
Latest research
Historical account research
Reproduced notices promise rewards in pounds and shillings before the first provincial paper issue.
Dated evidence, not exact birth or extinction dates.
1720supported
Reproduced notices promise rewards in pounds and shillings before the first provincial paper issue.
C1365
1773supported
Original scholarship reports 1,687 contract transactions denominated in local pounds, shillings and pence.
C1366
1794supported
Two hundred servant contracts were registered in pounds; paper-money stock is a separate question.
C1367
Evidence & research notes 3 claims
Dated observations, not a proven complete lifespan. Do not create nodes for paper emissions or infer termination at 1723,1776 or1793. Founding and complete lifespan remain unresolved.
Supported C1365
Reproduced notices promise rewards in pounds and shillings before the first provincial paper issue.
Ronald W.Michener and Robert E.Wright · Miscounting Money of Colonial America, Econ Journal Watch 3(1), January 2006, pp 4–44Citation S682 · Open source ↗
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Supported C1366
Original scholarship reports 1,687 contract transactions denominated in local pounds, shillings and pence.
Ronald W.Michener and Robert E.Wright · Miscounting Money of Colonial America, Econ Journal Watch 3(1), January 2006, pp 4–44Citation S682 · Open source ↗
Not a complete origin, lifespan or current-status audit.
Supported C1367
Two hundred servant contracts were registered in pounds; paper-money stock is a separate question.
Ronald W.Michener and Robert E.Wright · Miscounting Money of Colonial America, Econ Journal Watch 3(1), January 2006, pp 4–44Citation S682 · Open source ↗